Functional assessment-based interventions for students with or at-risk for high incidence disabilities: Field-testing single-case synthesis methods
This systematic review investigated one systematic approach to designing, implementing, and evaluating functional assessment–based interventions (FABI) for use in supporting school-age students with or at-risk for high-incidence disabilities. We field tested several recently developed methods for single-case design syntheses. First, we appraised the quality of individual studies and the overall body of work using Council for Exceptional Children’s standards. Next, we calculated and meta-analyzed within-case and between-case effect sizes. Results indicated that studies were of high methodological quality, with nine studies identified as being methodologically sound and demonstrating positive outcomes across 14 participants. However, insufficient evidence was available to classify the evidence base for FABIs due to small number of participants within (fewer than recommended three) and across (fewer than recommended 20) studies. Nonetheless, average within-case effect sizes were equivalent to increases of 118% between baseline and intervention phases. Finally, potential moderating variables were examined. Limitations and future directions are discussed.
Back to topCitation
@article{common2017,
author = {Common, Eric A. and Lane, Kathleen L. and Pustejovsky, James
E. and Johnson, Austin H. and Johl, Liane E.},
title = {Functional Assessment-Based Interventions for Students with
or at-Risk for High Incidence Disabilities: {Field-testing}
Single-Case Synthesis Methods},
journal = {Remedial and Special Education},
volume = {38},
number = {6},
pages = {331-352},
date = {2017-03-01},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517693320},
doi = {10.1016/j.jsp.2018.02.003},
langid = {en}
}