Psychosocial interventions for cancer survivors: A meta-analysis of effects on positive affect
Purpose: Positive affect has demonstrated unique benefits in the context of health-related stress and is emerging as an important target for psychosocial interventions. The primary objective of this meta-analysis was to determine whether psychosocial interventions increase positive affect in cancer survivors.
Methods: We coded 28 randomized controlled trials of psychosocial interventions assessing 2082 cancer survivors from six electronic databases. We calculated 76 effect sizes for positive affect and conducted synthesis using random effects models with robust variance estimation. Tests for moderation included demographic, clinical, and intervention characteristics.
Results: Interventions had a modest effect on positive affect (g = 0.35, 95% CI [0.16, 0.54]) with substantial heterogeneity of effects across studies (
Conclusions: In-person interventions with survivors of early-stage cancers hold promise for enhancing positive affect, but more methodological rigor is needed.
Implications for Cancer Survivors: Positive affect strategies can be an explicit target in evidence-based medicine and have a role in patient-centered survivorship care, providing tools to uniquely mobilize human strengths.
Back to topCitation
@article{salsman2019,
author = {Salsman, John A. and Pustejovsky, James E. and Schueller,
Stephen M. and Hernandez, Rosalba and Berendsen, Mark and McLouth,
Laurie E. Steffen and Moskowitz, Judith T.},
title = {Psychosocial Interventions for Cancer Survivors: {A}
Meta-Analysis of Effects on Positive Affect},
journal = {Journal of Cancer Survivorship},
volume = {13},
pages = {943-955},
date = {2019-11-19},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-019-00811-8},
doi = {10.1016/j.jsp.2018.02.003},
langid = {en}
}